BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
EXXEL Distributions
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-14-2012, 06:49 PM   #1
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Exclamation Test drove a E93 and a E92 Comp. Somewhat confused?

Hey all, so I just sold my E46 M3 couple of weeks ago and am in the process of looking for a E90/92 M3. Having never driven one I decided to test drive whatever my local dealer had in stock. Here at the 2 cars I drove back to back:

1) 2008 E93 M3 DCT 33000 miles

2) 2011 E92 M3 DCT with competition package 16000 miles


I first drove the E93 and I have to admit I wasn't impressed. I turned on the EDC as well as the Power and the M button.
- it felt smoothly fast but there was no raw power feel to it
- exhaust tone was missing and on high revs I heard more of a whine (no it was not supercharged). It was totally stock
- I never heard the downshift rev match. No clue why?
- the car felt a little floaty and overall I didn't like it that much

Now onto the 2011 E92 with the comp package. OMG it totally blew me away. It felt every bit good as I had expected it to be and the exhaust tone was amazing, the down shift rev match sounded awesome. I totally loved that car

You might think that I liked it more cuz it was a comp package with the tighter, better suspension but I am not even comparing that. I am just comparing the feel and sound of the engine and the exhaust. This seemed to be lacking on the E93. Even the DCT shifts felt way better and crisper on the E92.

Just to reconfirm, I drove both cars with similar settings. I never could go fast enough to test the handling. And yes, both cars were bone stock.

So I am super confused......why such a HUGE difference? I know the E93 is a lot heavier but I wasn't even looking at the handling or straight line accelaration aspect. The overall sound and shifts on the 2011 coupe was so much better, I loved every sec of it.

Not sure if this was a 2008 vs 2011 issue cuz I am not away of any or does the E93 just ride/feel and sound very different?

Or was it just a bad car that I drove?

Thanks.

Last edited by ///M///; 10-14-2012 at 07:47 PM..
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2012, 07:04 PM   #2
PhillyNate
ENTHUSIAST
PhillyNate's Avatar
United_States
135
Rep
2,097
Posts

Drives: 2010 Porsche Cayman
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Nearly 400lb weight difference between coupe and vert. 3 year and double the mileage difference in cars as well. I personally would have bought an M3 eventually even if a ZCP(Competition) package were not available. I doubt if ZCP totally tranforms the car. What I believe it does is take a car at 8.8/10ths to 9/10ths. That's all. I'm not a convertible guy, so that coupled with the added weight would've totally ruined the experience for me and wasn't even in the equation. Go drive some more coupes and some sedans for that matter and come back and tell us how you feel again. Good luck.
__________________
"what I'm driving here...is an ending." Jeremy Clarkson
2010 Carrara White Porsche Cayman 6mt
2014 Whiteout Toyota GT-86 6mt(Sold 05/23/15)
2011 Alpine White BMW M3 6mt ZCP Coupe(forced retirement 06/06/14)
2008 Alpine White BMW 328i 6mt Coupe(retired 06/21/11
)
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2012, 07:25 PM   #3
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Thanks. That's the plan for sure. I see you are local in Philly am finding it so hard to find any good private party cars locally. Don't plan to buy any from the stealership with their rip off prices Hoping to find a E90 soon what stumped me in the E93 was the exhaust and engine one. Didn't sound half as good as the E92.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyNate View Post
Nearly 400lb weight difference between coupe and vert. 3 year and double the mileage difference in cars as well. I personally would have bought an M3 eventually even if a ZCP(Competition) package were not available. I doubt if ZCP totally tranforms the car. What I believe it does is take a car at 8.8/10ths to 9/10ths. That's all. I'm not a convertible guy, so that coupled with the added weight would've totally ruined the experience for me and wasn't even in the equation. Go drive some more coupes and some sedans for that matter and come back and tell us how you feel again. Good luck.
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2012, 07:34 PM   #4
FormulaMMM
Brigadier General
FormulaMMM's Avatar
United_States
3663
Rep
3,422
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
what stumped me in the E93 was the exhaust and engine one. Didn't sound half as good as the E92.
That doesn't make any sense unless the E92 had an M Performance exhaust or aftermarket. Stock exhaust is the same between all models. If anything it should be more amplified on the E93.
__________________
M4 GTS, GT3, C63 S | E90 M3s, E39 M5

Appreciate 0
      10-14-2012, 07:40 PM   #5
PhillyNate
ENTHUSIAST
PhillyNate's Avatar
United_States
135
Rep
2,097
Posts

Drives: 2010 Porsche Cayman
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
Thanks. That's the plan for sure. I see you are local in Philly am finding it so hard to find any good private party cars locally. Don't plan to buy any from the stealership with their rip off prices Hoping to find a E90 soon what stumped me in the E93 was the exhaust and engine one. Didn't sound half as good as the E92.
Depending on who you ask around here, some say the later year cars are stronger. I know some engine internals changed from 2008 to the present. Some also say the exhausts sound healthier on later years as well. I personally think the stock exhaust is classy and sounds good but is too quiet. Finding cars to test drive is going to be hit or miss for a variety of reasons but keep trying.
__________________
"what I'm driving here...is an ending." Jeremy Clarkson
2010 Carrara White Porsche Cayman 6mt
2014 Whiteout Toyota GT-86 6mt(Sold 05/23/15)
2011 Alpine White BMW M3 6mt ZCP Coupe(forced retirement 06/06/14)
2008 Alpine White BMW 328i 6mt Coupe(retired 06/21/11
)
Appreciate 0
      10-14-2012, 07:42 PM   #6
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaMMM View Post
That doesn't make any sense unless the E92 had an M Performance exhaust or aftermarket. Stock exhaust is the same between all models. If anything it should be more amplified on the E93.
I know! Right? That's what had me stumped I confirmed it had a stock exhaust.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyNate View Post
Depending on who you ask around here, some say the later year cars are stronger. I know some engine internals changed from 2008 to the present. Some also say the exhausts sound healthier on later years as well. I personally think the stock exhaust is classy and sounds good but is too quiet. Finding cars to test drive is going to be hit or miss for a variety of reasons but keep trying.
You bet. Thanks again.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 09:24 AM   #7
jphughan
Brigadier General
jphughan's Avatar
United_States
594
Rep
4,488
Posts

Drives: '16 Cayman GT4
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

The E93 will be a bit slower to build revs because of its added weight which might make it sound less "eager", but if you drove with the top down it definitely shouldn't have been quieter. Are you sure there were no relevant aftermarket mods on either one?

Some people have indeed speculated that newer engines are stronger; not sure about that, but the software for both the engine and transmission has definitely evolved somewhat, so it may be worth requesting a software update from the dealer or a vendor on these boards if you get an older model year. That could explain the transmission difference in particular, assuming you made certain you were in the same shift mode between the two cars as it sounds like you did.

As for the whine up top, that's characteristic of the engine, and frankly the fact that it can sound kind of like a muscle car up to 4K and start to channel F1 on the top end is one of the things I love about this engine.

Other than that, not sure what to tell you OP.
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)

Gone but not forgotten:
'11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015)
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 09:39 AM   #8
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jphughan View Post
The E93 will be a bit slower to build revs because of its added weight which might make it sound less "eager", but if you drove with the top down it definitely shouldn't have been quieter. Are you sure there were no relevant aftermarket mods on either one?

Some people have indeed speculated that newer engines are stronger; not sure about that, but the software for both the engine and transmission has definitely evolved somewhat, so it may be worth requesting a software update from the dealer or a vendor on these boards if you get an older model year. That could explain the transmission difference in particular, assuming you made certain you were in the same shift mode between the two cars as it sounds like you did.

As for the whine up top, that's characteristic of the engine, and frankly the fact that it can sound kind of like a muscle car up to 4K and start to channel F1 on the top end is one of the things I love about this engine.

Other than that, not sure what to tell you OP.
Thanks, that helps. Was just looking to see if I missed anything. Let me put it this way, if I had just driven this particular E93, I would've left disappointed wondering what was so special about the M3? But after driving the newer E92 it was a world of a difference.

But as others have suggested I need to drive a few more to get a feel for the car.

Thanks.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 10:31 AM   #9
Carl L
Major
Carl L's Avatar
196
Rep
1,248
Posts

Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
Thanks, that helps. Was just looking to see if I missed anything. Let me put it this way, if I had just driven this particular E93, I would've left disappointed wondering what was so special about the M3? But after driving the newer E92 it was a world of a difference.

.
The the difference between an E92 and an E93, 12% more weight is huge.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 12:14 PM   #10
Koldun
Banned
10
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyNate View Post
I doubt if ZCP totally tranforms the car.
Haven't you heard? Any M3 without ZCP is a Civic.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 05:57 PM   #11
HALOTHANE
First Lieutenant
HALOTHANE's Avatar
36
Rep
391
Posts

Drives: INTERLAGOS ZCP
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Anywhere fast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Where the S program modes identical on both cars? You have to be in S5 to activate rev matching. Regardless, there is a distinct performance focused tune with the ZCP package. Also, if you plan to track the car you should get the E92. Never understood why M would make an M3 convertible (except to sell more cars). It seems incongruous with the focus of BMW Motorsport.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 06:33 PM   #12
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HALOTHANE View Post
Where the S program modes identical on both cars? You have to be in S5 to activate rev matching. Regardless, there is a distinct performance focused tune with the ZCP package. Also, if you plan to track the car you should get the E92. Never understood why M would make an M3 convertible (except to sell more cars). It seems incongruous with the focus of BMW Motorsport.
Are you saying there is no rev match in S1 thru S4? Wasn't aware of this
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 07:22 PM   #13
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
84
Rep
2,792
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jphughan View Post
Some people have indeed speculated that newer engines are stronger; not sure about that, but the software for both the engine and transmission has definitely evolved somewhat, so it may be worth requesting a software update from the dealer or a vendor on these boards if you get an older model year. That could explain the transmission difference in particular, assuming you made certain you were in the same shift mode between the two cars as it sounds like you did.
+1

Old software on the E93 could make a HUGE difference in the engine and transmission. I gained ~20 HP just from a software update for example. Some people even say that the brakes and steering feel better with new software.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 07:28 PM   #14
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3PO View Post
+1

Old software on the E93 could make a HUGE difference in the engine and transmission. I gained ~20 HP just from a software update for example. Some people even say that the brakes and steering feel better with new software.
Do the 09's already have this update or was it later years? Is this a free update that the dealer an do if requested?
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 07:39 PM   #15
M3PO
Colonel
M3PO's Avatar
84
Rep
2,792
Posts

Drives: '08 IB E92
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: OC

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
Do the 09's already have this update or was it later years? Is this a free update that the dealer an do if requested?
BMW is continually updating the software. My car is an 08 6MT and had the original software. It's less likely that the older DCT cars will have the original software that they rolled off the line with because there was a pretty prominent issue with the DCT being sluggish. Because of that, a lot of the early DCT cars were updated. That said, even if it was updated for the sluggishness issue and hasn't been updated in the ~2 years since, it could still benefit from an update.
__________________
2008 IB E92 M3| BBS | KW | Arkym | Platte Forme A.G. | Active Autowerke | K&N | Fabspeed | Dinan | Evolve-R
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 07:58 PM   #16
amyoescobar
New Member
0
Rep
6
Posts

Drives: audi
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: you

iTrader: (0)

It seems incongruous with the focus of BMW Motorsport
__________________
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 09:26 PM   #17
GrussGott
Lieutenant General
GrussGott's Avatar
United_States
18198
Rep
11,763
Posts

Drives: 2018 M4 Comp Indv
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newport Beach

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
But as others have suggested I need to drive a few more to get a feel for the car.
Please update the thread when you do ... I've never driven any M3 except my 2011 e93 and it feels floaty. Prior to that I had an S4 and that was rock solid - felt like a bank vault on wheels with a rocket under it.

But the floaty feeling ... I definitely have that. I've got the 18" wheels and I do still have winters on but am thinking of getting some Volk te37 18s w Michelin PSPs and am hoping that makes it feel more stable.

If not ... well then I guess the e93 is just floaty. There's no way in hell I'm driving anything but a 'vert so if that's the case I'll just have to deal w it.

Anyway, please update the thread after you drive a few more and thanks in advance!
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 09:31 PM   #18
jphughan
Brigadier General
jphughan's Avatar
United_States
594
Rep
4,488
Posts

Drives: '16 Cayman GT4
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HALOTHANE View Post
You have to be in S5 to activate rev matching. Regardless, there is a distinct performance focused tune with the ZCP package.
Incorrect on both counts. S4 includes rev-matching, and I believe (but am not certain) that S3 does as well. And the ZCP-specific software only applies to Sport EDC (where it's adaptive like Normal and Comfort rather than static the way it is on non-ZCP cars) and a more lenient MDM mode -- but Euro MDM which is even more lenient can be coded to cars anyway, even those that didn't come with M Drive from the factory if you buy one relatively inexpensive and easy to install part. More info available if you search MDM Retrofit. But there's nothing about the engine or transmission software that's unique to ZCP. Maybe you're thinking of the M3 GTS?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsm918 View Post
Do the 09's already have this update or was it later years? Is this a free update that the dealer an do if requested?
Updates are continuous. The recent 231E engine software that's been discussed on here was only released a few months ago. Software updates are only free if you're under warranty and you complain about a problem for which BMW has a TSB where the recommended fix is to update the software. If you don't have such a problem and/or you're out of warranty, then it would be on your dime.
__________________
'16 Cayman GT4 (delivery pics, comparison to E92 M3 write-up)

Gone but not forgotten:
'11.75 M3 E92 Le Mans | Black Nov w/ Alum | 6MT (owned 5/2011 - 11/2015)
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 09:42 PM   #19
///M///
Brigadier General
///M///'s Avatar
1865
Rep
3,661
Posts

Drives: 2016 Manual AW F80
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Philly

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrussGott View Post
Please update the thread when you do ... I've never driven any M3 except my 2011 e93 and it feels floaty. Prior to that I had an S4 and that was rock solid - felt like a bank vault on wheels with a rocket under it.

But the floaty feeling ... I definitely have that. I've got the 18" wheels and I do still have winters on but am thinking of getting some Volk te37 18s w Michelin PSPs and am hoping that makes it feel more stable.

If not ... well then I guess the e93 is just floaty. There's no way in hell I'm driving anything but a 'vert so if that's the case I'll just have to deal w it.

Anyway, please update the thread after you drive a few more and thanks in advance!
Will do for sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jphughan View Post
Incorrect on both counts. S4 includes rev-matching, and I believe (but am not certain) that S3 does as well. And the ZCP-specific software only applies to Sport EDC (where it's adaptive like Normal and Comfort rather than static the way it is on non-ZCP cars) and a more lenient MDM mode -- but Euro MDM which is even more lenient can be coded to cars anyway, even those that didn't come with M Drive from the factory if you buy one relatively inexpensive and easy to install part. More info available if you search MDM Retrofit. But there's nothing about the engine or transmission software that's unique to ZCP. Maybe you're thinking of the M3 GTS?



Updates are continuous. The recent 231E engine software that's been discussed on here was only released a few months ago. Software updates are only free if you're under warranty and you complain about a problem for which BMW has a TSB where the recommended fix is to update the software. If you don't have such a problem and/or you're out of warranty, then it would be on your dime.
Thanks for the clarification. This really helps.
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 10:24 PM   #20
Phantom_9192
Private First Class
Phantom_9192's Avatar
105
Rep
125
Posts

Drives: 2019 M2C
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2019 BMW M2C  [0.00]
My car rev-matches in S4 but not S3. That appears to be the cutoff. Even though I wish I could do the match manually in S4 like I did in my SMG E46, I still vastly prefer S4 over S3 in the DCT.
__________________
2003 SGM SMG - Sold but not forgotten!
2010 JzB/DCT Moved on to next owner
2019 HS 6MT M2C
Appreciate 0
      10-15-2012, 10:37 PM   #21
M4Now!
Captain
292
Rep
708
Posts

Drives: MG / SO F83
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

There's some problem with the e93; as others have said, if you didn't hear the exhaust and it wasn't fast, there's some drivetrain problem.

Cheers
__________________


Bye bye E93 M3 - Hello F83 M4!
Appreciate 0
      10-16-2012, 12:00 AM   #22
GrussGott
Lieutenant General
GrussGott's Avatar
United_States
18198
Rep
11,763
Posts

Drives: 2018 M4 Comp Indv
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newport Beach

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom_9192 View Post
My car rev-matches in S4 but not S3. That appears to be the cutoff. Even though I wish I could do the match manually in S4 like I did in my SMG E46, I still vastly prefer S4 over S3 in the DCT.
S3 will rev match but you really have to be on it; ive got a couple of fast switchbacks coming off of a freeway that require lots of shifting and the final ones will rev match
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST