Next Level Auto Brokers
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M3 (F80) and BMW M4 (F82) General Forum

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-07-2013, 10:41 AM   #45
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
209
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

I was just curious about the all so "fast" tesla S.

12.3 1/4 time with trap speed of only 110mph?! I thought that thing was fast. Add just a little more distance and even the current m3 is blowing past it (trap speed 115-117). Am i correct?

And they say it kills the performance of the f series m5/6.
Appreciate 0
      10-07-2013, 12:20 PM   #46
KevN27
Private
United_States
3
Rep
51
Posts

Drives: ///M
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: West

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
I was just curious about the all so "fast" tesla S.

12.3 1/4 time with trap speed of only 110mph?! I thought that thing was fast. Add just a little more distance and even the current m3 is blowing past it (trap speed 115-117). Am i correct?

And they say it kills the performance of the f series m5/6.
From a stop, it's going to be ahead for quite some time. Not sure what the 60-130 is for the P85, my guess is not very fast.

The only video we've seen online is the obviously [personally]] rigged vs. the F10 M5.

I am hoping the F80 M3/4 will destroy it long before the 1/4 distance, like this CTS-V with 11.75 a@ 120mph.

Appreciate 0
      10-07-2013, 12:32 PM   #47
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
209
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevN27
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
I was just curious about the all so "fast" tesla S.

12.3 1/4 time with trap speed of only 110mph?! I thought that thing was fast. Add just a little more distance and even the current m3 is blowing past it (trap speed 115-117). Am i correct?

And they say it kills the performance of the f series m5/6.
From a stop, it's going to be ahead for quite some time. Not sure what the 60-130 is for the P85, my guess is not very fast.

The only video we've seen online is the obviously [personally]] rigged vs. the F10 M5.

I am hoping the F80 M3/4 will destroy it long before the 1/4 distance, like this CTS-V with 11.75 a@ 120mph.

Beginning doesnt really much matter as the guy in the tesla will be thinking wth hes slowly gaining. No wonder i (a track noob) was seeing a tesla (driven by an instructor) disappear from my rear view on the straights.
Appreciate 0
      10-07-2013, 02:48 PM   #48
gee-m-w
First Lieutenant
gee-m-w's Avatar
74
Rep
348
Posts

Drives: S4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

The Tesla S has come a long way from the Roadster in terms of track day suitability. Having no gears and max torque at 0 RPM is an advantage. The car can easily do 100 minutes of track time in a day. Caveats: no engine noise is weird in a hot pit, power is reduced by about half when you are below 25% battery, and you won't have enough juice to get home after the track day (hotel overnight stay on Sunday).
__________________
WTB: 2016 M3 sedan, Black Sapphire, Extended Sakhir Lether, Ceramic Brakes, 19" black wheels, Lighting Package, HK sound, USB/Bluetooth
Sold: 2006 e90 325i 6MT, ground control coilovers, Remus exhaust
Appreciate 0
      10-09-2013, 08:45 AM   #49
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
209
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gee-m-w
The Tesla S has come a long way from the Roadster in terms of track day suitability. Having no gears and max torque at 0 RPM is an advantage. The car can easily do 100 minutes of track time in a day. Caveats: no engine noise is weird in a hot pit, power is reduced by about half when you are below 25% battery, and you won't have enough juice to get home after the track day (hotel overnight stay on Sunday).
Yeah but looking at trap speeds it sure does seem that it loses a lot of its acceleration in the top end. Eg m3 does what, high 12s at 116mph while the cla 45 does the same but at 107 and the teslaS at 110. Especially in long straights where you can easily hit 150ish, it will be sluggish no? And it does weigh 4000lbs and is limited to 130mph? (I may be incorrect i realize.)
Appreciate 0
      10-09-2013, 03:24 PM   #50
Carl L
Major
Carl L's Avatar
196
Rep
1,248
Posts

Drives: '15 M3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Are you referring to the odd but totally traditional standard of US drag racing allowing 1 foot of travel before the timer starts? That's called a roll out and it contributes about 0.3 seconds to a faster 0-60 time. So that is not cheating it is just different standards. I don't know much about European 1/4 mi testing specs, I think they more often do 0-1000m.
No, I was more looking at trap speeds as I'm not big into 0-60 times. Take the Roush Stage 3 which has Ford factory backing. "575 bhp" and yet runs a 114mph quarter. Seems to happen a lot with Ford and Dodge in particular, Evo often makes note of it.

Interesting to hear about the different testing standards though. I did know that, but it explains some results now that's for sure.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 10:14 AM   #51
gee-m-w
First Lieutenant
gee-m-w's Avatar
74
Rep
348
Posts

Drives: S4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Yeah but looking at trap speeds it sure does seem that it loses a lot of its acceleration in the top end. Eg m3 does what, high 12s at 116mph while the cla 45 does the same but at 107 and the teslaS at 110. Especially in long straights where you can easily hit 150ish, it will be sluggish no? And it does weigh 4000lbs and is limited to 130mph? (I may be incorrect i realize.)
BMW has been making cars since Nazi Germany. Tesla has been making its own original car for only a year. It is an incredible accomplishment that a family car with the practicality of a Dodge Caravan powered by batteries and weighing more than a Bentley Continental Flying Spur can do this so well. The Tesla S beats the pants off an E39 M5, which was the fastest supercar anyone had ever heard of no less than 8 years ago. I think those cars barely break into the 12's for 1/4 mile.
__________________
WTB: 2016 M3 sedan, Black Sapphire, Extended Sakhir Lether, Ceramic Brakes, 19" black wheels, Lighting Package, HK sound, USB/Bluetooth
Sold: 2006 e90 325i 6MT, ground control coilovers, Remus exhaust
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 10:50 AM   #52
tdizzle
Colonel
United_States
107
Rep
1,997
Posts

Drives: 2017 F80 ZCP
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Memphis

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gee-m-w View Post
BMW has been making cars since Nazi Germany. Tesla has been making its own original car for only a year. It is an incredible accomplishment that a family car with the practicality of a Dodge Caravan powered by batteries and weighing more than a Bentley Continental Flying Spur can do this so well. The Tesla S beats the pants off an E39 M5, which was the fastest supercar anyone had ever heard of no less than 8 years ago. I think those cars barely break into the 12's for 1/4 mile.
It is amazing the progress we've seen in the last decade. It wasn't too long ago cars doing 0-60 under 6 seconds were considered fast. I remember thinking the 333hp M3 was so powerful in the not too distant past. Now a normal person can buy a car that can run circles around the 'supercars' of 10-15 years ago.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 12:57 PM   #53
Wolfinwolfsclothing
Banned
37
Rep
1,312
Posts

Drives: E92 ///M3 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: B-roads

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Yeah but looking at trap speeds it sure does seem that it loses a lot of its acceleration in the top end. Eg m3 does what, high 12s at 116mph while the cla 45 does the same but at 107 and the teslaS at 110. Especially in long straights where you can easily hit 150ish, it will be sluggish no? And it does weigh 4000lbs and is limited to 130mph? (I may be incorrect i realize.)
M3 is high 12s at ~112 mph, not 116.
Appreciate 0
      10-10-2013, 01:51 PM   #54
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
209
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfinwolfsclothing View Post
M3 is high 12s at ~112 mph, not 116.
oops, i was doing it based on recollection of an earlier thread and post. But, shows how much I really care about 1/4 mile times.....most races are longer than that!
Appreciate 0
      10-12-2013, 07:03 PM   #55
HeavyMetalRocker
Captain
HeavyMetalRocker's Avatar
United_States
34
Rep
632
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW 335i E90 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dallas, Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Well you are entitled to your guess/opinion on the times. I'm sure some bad drivers will often complete 12.X second runs, heck even 13.X ones.

However, you can't have an opinion on the relationship between power and torque. If a car makes 450 ft lb at the wheels (at say 5000 rpm, which is consistent with the engine curves we have been shown) that translates to 428 wheel hp which is 486 crank hp (assuming a reasonable 12% loss). Which is it 380 wheel hp or 450 wheel torque? The latter would be easily capable of 11.X second runs.
No you're right, I didn't do any math for that one sorry. The horsepower figure is what I will choose to go off of. I highly doubt that they'll have a stocker putting out 450 rwtq. They might do it, I just doubt it! Also of note, the transmission can have a huge play in the quarter times. DCT etc... I just don't see them making a sub 12 sec car, not saying I won't be impressed or pleased with their progress if I'm wrong!
__________________
2007 335i e90 6mt | Motiv 750 XR8267 | RB PCV | JB4 G5 | MHD Pump Flash | Walbro 255lph | VRSF CP & Tial BOV | NGK Plugs | Custom Side Exhaust | CxRacing FMIC | Spec 2+ & SSMFW | StopTech Drilled/Slotted Rotors | Hawk Performance Pads | DEFIV Lockdown kit | Mtec V3 | Apex PS7s | 35/15% Llumar ceramic
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 06:55 PM   #56
stantaur
Registered
0
Rep
4
Posts

Drives: E36 M3 4D/Auto
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Austin

iTrader: (0)

Any F80 M3 / F82 M4 quarter mile times yet?

This thread came up searching for M3 quarters; curious if anyone's seen magazine results yet or has vids to share.

I defected from my mid-14 sec E36 M3 to 12.4 IS-F when the M3s tanked fuel mileage (IS-F gets me 27 MPG Hwy & 12.4 @ 114 clip below was before lightweight exhaust & battery)

http://youtu.be/kxyZ0qrQolE?t=55s

Long-time BMW fan & hoping the new M3/4 runs mid-low 12s and 115-ish once they get early production irregularities/ringers sorted. If not the M3/4, then likely waiting for M2...
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 07:31 PM   #57
phear_me
Private
United_States
8
Rep
98
Posts

Drives: BMW M4
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (0)

Assuming some of these dynos that we're seeing are correct (410RWHP) my guess for an M4 with DCT using Launch Control - 11.94 @ 118MPH
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 09:32 PM   #58
gthal
Major General
gthal's Avatar
Canada
1904
Rep
5,678
Posts

Drives: 2018 340i xDrive
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by phear_me View Post
Assuming some of these dynos that we're seeing are correct (410RWHP) my guess for an M4 with DCT using Launch Control - 11.94 @ 118MPH
I agree... in good conditions, this is a 11.9 to 12.1s car @ 116 to 119mph. I'm not personally really into drag times (I'm more concerned with road course ability) but I think the car is capable of those numbers stock.
__________________
2020 X3 M40i | Black | Current DD
2020 C8 Corvette | Z51 | Torch Red ... built and waiting for delivery
2016 M2 | Long Beach Blue | 6MT
2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | DCT
2012 MB C63AMG | 2011 E92 M3 | 2010 E92 M3
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 09:52 PM   #59
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

low 12 secs, 118-120 mph
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 AM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST