View Single Post
      09-21-2014, 12:12 PM   #13
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Colonel
99
Rep
2,000
Posts

Drives: 2017 C63
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boss330 View Post
..The troubling part must be the variation of 50whp that the Dynojets so far shows for the S55... I won't say anything more about this then say that to me this correlates well with previously observed Dynojet variation. But everyone can decide for themselves if this is the fault of the S55, the Dynojet or measuring techniques...
For me, the Dynojet variation isn't troubling at all. You just pretty much take the higher numbers as more or less "gospel", and ignore the lower numbers. As I've amply demonstrated in Swamp's "Significant recant" thread, setup sloppiness/errors all result in lower observed numbers.

Really the only Dynojet issue is whether the operators ran with ambient meteorological adjustments to their observed numbers, which is a no-no with the current M3/M4, and other current turbo cars as well. You'd think they'd all have gotten the message by now, but perhaps not.
Appreciate 0