I'm pretty happy w/ the 24-105, but it wasn't much extra when I got my camera so I'd say it was worth it. If you've already got the 24-70 then I'd agree, no need to change.
16-35 is a fun lens too, and I find myself using it. 50 primes are good too, not much money and it makes you think about your shot and do "sneaker zoom". These cover what I need to do. I had a 70-300 once but never used it and sold it. Some of the macro's could be fun.
Kinda comes down to what you shoot. With the 17-55 you had, did you find yourself using up the range or not so much? Wishing you could go higher or lower or not so much?
|